State Approves Guidelines for Withdrawing Life Support from Terminally-Ill Patients
Tap a highlighted term for a quick explanation.
On July 8, 2026, the state's Minister for Health, Medical and Family Welfare approved a fresh set of guidelines that spell out how doctors and hospitals should handle the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for patients who are terminally ill and have no hope of recovery.
This move traces back to a 2018 Supreme Court judgment that recognised the right to die with dignity as part of the fundamental right to life under the Constitution. The court later, in 2023, laid down detailed procedures for such cases and refined them further to remove ambiguity. However, until this week, the state had no official guidelines of its own, which often left doctors and family members uncertain about how to proceed in such painful situations.
Under the new rules, the first step when a patient is diagnosed as terminally ill is to check whether they had signed an Advance Medical Directive while still mentally sound. This is a written statement made in advance, specifying what kind of medical treatment a person does or does not want if they later become incapable of deciding for themselves. Such a directive must be signed voluntarily in front of two independent witnesses and verified by a notary or a gazetted officer, with a copy submitted to the local civic body, which then assigns someone to safeguard it.
If no such directive exists, the hospital must set up a Primary Medical Board to evaluate the case. This board consults the family physician, if there is one, along with the patient's close relatives or guardian, weighing the benefits and drawbacks of continuing or stopping treatment. If the guardian agrees in writing to withdrawal of life support, the matter is passed on to a Secondary Medical Board, which independently examines the patient before giving its own opinion.
Only when both boards agree, and the family or nominated person consents, can the withdrawal of treatment proceed. If either board disagrees, the family or guardian retains the right to approach the High Court for a final decision.
Senior health officials, including the Director of Medical Education and the Director of Secondary Health, along with district-level medical officers, have been tasked with monitoring hospitals to make sure these guidelines are properly followed across the state.
This step is significant because it turns a broad constitutional right recognised by the Supreme Court into a clear, actionable process at the state level, giving both medical staff and families a transparent framework to follow during extremely difficult end-of-life decisions.
Why it matters
For years, doctors and families faced legal and ethical uncertainty when deciding whether to continue treating patients with no real chance of recovery, since no clear local procedure existed despite the Supreme Court's recognition of the right to die with dignity. These new guidelines translate that right into a concrete, step-by-step process, protecting patients from prolonged suffering, safeguarding families and doctors from legal ambiguity, and ensuring that decisions to withdraw life support are made carefully, transparently, and with proper checks through medical boards and, if needed, judicial review.
Test yourself
1. What recent action did the state's Health Minister take regarding terminally-ill patients?
2. Which Supreme Court judgment first recognised the right to die with dignity as a fundamental right?
3. What is an Advance Medical Directive?
4. Who must witness the signing of an Advance Medical Directive?
5. Where must a copy of the Advance Medical Directive be submitted?
6. What happens if there is no Advance Medical Directive?
7. What role does the Secondary Medical Board play?
8. What can a guardian do if both medical boards refuse withdrawal of treatment?
9. Why were these guidelines considered necessary?
10. Who has been tasked with overseeing implementation of these guidelines?
Your notes
Source: The Hindu